My Photo

  • About BWIA / WiMAX News

    Broadband Wireless Internet Access / WiMAX News provides original, independent, unique, in-depth, dedicated perspective on significant developments in the rapidly-evolving Broadband Wireless Internet Access (BWIA) / WiMAX industry.

    This site includes content that has been consolidated from previous sites and original content dating back to 1997 when Editor / Analyst Steve Stroh began writing professionally about Broadband Wireless Internet Access (predating "WiMAX" by a minimum of five years).

  • About Steve Stroh

    2008 marked the beginning of my second decade of writing professionally about Broadband Wireless Internet Access (BWIA), WiMAX, Wi-Fi, and other wireless-related subjects.

    You can read more about me on my bio page.

    All of my articles (beginning 2008-01) are listed at
    Steve Stroh Articles.

    Send me email.

Steve Stroh Articles

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 12/2006

« BWIA Things I Wish For | Main | Ubiquiti Networks Fires The Bullet, A Tiny Inline Outdoor BWIA Radio »

October 23, 2008


Charles Brown

Hi Steve,

I was wondering about your views of aggregate bandwidth capability for providing what could legitimately be called "broadband" over the 6MHz channels in the white spaces. I never see that topic discussed anywhere either. What do you think we are we talking about here in terms of BWIA?

I take your point about "increments" in regulatory matters, but I would like to remind that the Part 15.247 rules were pushed from being visionary, infrastructure class BWIA in 1985 to short-range WLAN devices, especially with regard to the power rules. To my mind, this was hardly positive "regulatory evolution" even it did result in new technology development within the confines of 802.11. One could argue the opposite point, i.e., what could we have seen in product development and alternative access infrastructure had the original vision of 15.247 prevailed in its original form? It seems to me that this is a history lesson worth noting as well.

Steve replies:

Charles - agreed that 15.247 could have been so much more. Our mutual colleague Dewayne Hendricks has educated me about how much grander was the original vision than what actually came to be allowed. But, politics... and the FCC is all about politics... has been called "the art of the possible" and I think that applies to 15.247. It's taken decades longer than we hoped to see some of the real potential of license-exempt spectrum usage, but it's finally happening.

As for white spaces... well... 15 years or so ago, Alvarion was able to achieve 3 bits/Hz - a FHSS system that achieved 3 Mbps in a 1 MHz channel. That's old technology now, but even using a conservative 5 MHz channel to provide for some guard bands, that's a potential 15 Mbps. And, there's nothing to prevent systems from aggregating adjacent channels, so you really aren't "stuck" with "just" a mere 6 MHz channel.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search BWIA/WiMAX News

  • only search BWIA/WiMAX News

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Other BWIA
Blogs And Sites