I thought this would be of interest to readers. The title comes from a June 6, 2002 posting to the isp-wireless mailing list (
http://www.isp-wireless.com) by Marlon Schafer of Odessa Office Equipment (
http://www.ooe.com). Marlon is a Wireless ISP in Odessa, WA that is (deservedly) held in very high regard by the inmates... er, "audience" of the isp-wireless mailing list. Rather than co-opt Marlon's words, I'll refer readers to the archive version of Marlon's post at
http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-wireless/0206/msg00863.html. Marlon's posting is well worth reading to get a sense of just how different the performance of the WaveRider equipment is from Marlon's well-developed 2.4 GHz Wireless Internet Access network in Odessa, WA.
WaveRider Communications (http://www.waverider.com) is a Canadian Broadband Wireless Internet Access equipment manufacturer. WaveRider's Last Mile Solution (LMS) product line operates in the 902-928 MHz ISM band. This is significant because 902-928 MHz has far superior foliage penetration characteristics than equipment that operates in the 2.4 GHz band. The relative lack of foliage penetration is a major factor in Wireless ISPs not being able to serve every potential customer who desires Wireless Internet Access service. To date, the 902-928 MHz band has been largely ignored by the vast majority of Wireless ISP equipment vendors (two important exceptions are Wi-LAN - www.wi-lan.com and the late, much-lamented Metricom who used the 902-928 MHz band extensively for user-to-poletop communications.) Largely ignored, because 902-928 MHz offers a smaller amount of spectrum in comparison to 2.4 GHz (26 MHz versus 83 MHz) and is 902-928 MHz is, for the most part, only available in North America (the 2.4 GHz band is nearly universal). I've long thought that with proper equipment, 902-928 MHz could easily be a "Wireless ISP Secret Weapon" in areas where Wireless Internet Access service is desired (customers waiting...) but 2.4 GHz equipment just won't penetrate. While there are many other vendors of 902-928 MHz data communications equipment (largely used for SCADA and other low-bandwidth telemetry applications), such equipment is largely inappropriate for Wireless Internet Access use. WaveRider's LMS product line is relatively new and hasn't been very extensively reviewed. As I state in my posting, I had some previous experience with 902-928 MHz equipment so had some basis for comparison.
On June 7, 2002, I followed up Marlon's posting with my own posting to isp-wireless:
Well, Marlon beat me to the keyboard, but he was about 200 miles closer to his than I was to mine at the end of the day.
I had to give Marlon a bit of hell because for his initial tests he had like 2/3 of the antenna taped up against the steel mast, and I knew on sight that was severely compromising anything resembling a normal radiation pattern (if not actually causing SWR and foldback of transmit power). Something that I didn't reveal to Marlon at the time was that I'd had some experience with 900 MHz gear, and I was fairly sure that what he was describing was not normal behavior for a 900 MHz system, which in general penetrates trees, houses, etc. pretty well.
For the tests we ran together, if we had mounted the base antenna up and in the clear better (something resembling a permanent installation) and away from the shading effect of the water tank, I think we would have had total saturation coverage at both ends of town where we lost signal.
Like Marlon, I was very impressed with the coverage (once we finally cottoned on to which end was front of the CPE panel antenna). TAKE THE HINT, WAVERIDER - PUT A LABEL ON THE FRONT! One thing I observed was that when we lost signal, it took a few seconds to recover, like the radio wasn't going to let the ping go through until it was "sure" that the signal had been re-established. In that time we had moved 10 feet or so. In a real-world test, the radio isn't designed to be mobile, so I don't count that "slow acquisition time" against it. In a real environment, you'd move the antenna around the room in various places to find the best signal, and then LEAVE it there.
A minor nit... the CPE panel antenna is very light in comparison to the relatively stiff, heavy coax cable. I can easily imagine the antenna getting pulled out of a window sill by the weight of the coax. I didn't get to see the entire system as it came in the box (Marlon pretty well stripped it down to essentials to take it on the road), but if there isn't a mounting frame that gives a bit of weight and stability to the panel antenna, there should be.
Another minor nit - the RSSI utility (constantly writing out the RSSI readings when in a telnet session) worked great, but the telnet session timed out way too quickly for our use in road testing... of course, it's designed as a quick test for optimizing the location of the antenna within the range of the length of coax (which is about 6' or so). So, I don't count that against them either, it just would have been nice to see RSSI readings continuously just like we were seeing the pings.
One last thing that I clarified with Mitch while on the phone. The cavity filter that WaveRider offers may not be necessary unless you're going to deploy in close proximity to paging transmitters AND you're going to run enough base stations that you'll need to use 5 MHz channels near the edges of the band. For Marlon's test we set it on 915 MHz and it worked fine... but there weren't any known paging transmitters nearby.
All in all, nice job, WaveRider. Please tell Bruce Sinclair that THIS was the product that I had REALLY wanted to see and hear about when WaveRider had their big public debut that I attended in Vancouver, BC in 1997 or 1998.
This final line of my posting warrants some additional comment. WaveRider first unveiled the idea for the LMS product line at a press conference in Vancouver, BC in 1997 or 1998 which I attended (it was sometime shortly after the debut of my Wireless Data Developments column in Boardwatch Magazine.) The nearly-ready-for-sale product that WaveRider announced at the time was a 2.4 GHz version of LMS. At that press conference, WaveRider spoke of the LMS product line eventually expanding into other license-exempt bands such as 902-928 MHz. I felt at the time, and (I think) stated this to WaveRider personnel that were present, that WaveRider's 2.4 product was entering a very crowded market for 2.4 GHz equipment, and that the announcement of a 902-928 MHz version of LMS, even though still in development, was more significant in the long term. In the years since, as far as I can tell, that early assessment has been borne out. WaveRider only began to gain notable success in the marketplace with the emergence of the 902-928 MHz LMS.
Steve Stroh
Copyright (c) 2002-2004 by Steve Stroh. This article originally appeared on my original Broadband Wireless Internet Access Weblog hosted on Radio Userland.